Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42394239›Full record

ReviewPediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society

Ancillary and Advanced Techniques for the Postmortem Examination.

Halit Pinar, Füsun Gündoğan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Halit PinarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner School of Medicine of the University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
Füsun GündoğanDepartment of Pathology, Regional Perinatal Pathology Service, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis article describes how techniques such as advanced imaging, nucleic acid evaluation, integrated approaches, and data collection systems can facilitate the examination of a stillbirth or newborn, particularly when an autopsy is not possible. CONTENT: The traditional autopsy remains the gold standard for investigating stillbirth and neonatal death. However, declining rates due to parental refusal, financial constraints, and cultural barriers highlight the need to widely adopt modern alternatives. This review examines emerging ancillary and advanced diagnostic techniques necessary to maximize diagnostic yield and ensure equitable access to comprehensive postmortem evaluations. Since imaging alone often misses critical microscopic pathologies, hybrid methods like Minimally Invasive Autopsy with Laparoscopically Assisted Sampling (MinImAL) are essential. MinImAL combines Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PMMR) with image-guided tissue sampling to acquire specimens for histological and microbiological analysis. Complementary molecular techniques aid in identifying underlying genetic causes and informing recurrence risk. The success of these tests relies on optimized tissue selection. Systemic improvements include adopting standardized protocols, establishing Stillbirth Centers of Excellence, and using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for risk prediction. Importantly, integrating these advanced, less invasive methods is vital for addressing financial and racial health disparities, especially given the lack of Medicaid coverage for autopsy, thereby ensuring all bereaved families receive accurate and necessary diagnostic information.

Indexed as

StillbirthAutopsyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingPostmortem Imagingartificial intelligenceautopsyDNAfetusradiologyreviewvirtopsy

Identifiers

PMID42394239
PMCPMC13332187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.