ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
MET Expression in Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma: Prevalence, Prognostic Impact, and Implications for Anti-MET Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MET is an actionable receptor tyrosine kinase, and MET-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have recently entered clinical practice with FDA approval in non-small cell lung cancer and are now being evaluated across gastrointestinal malignancies, with patient selection based on MET immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ membranous staining at varying percentage thresholds. However, robust real-world data on MET protein expression and clinically relevant ADC-aligned thresholds in upper GI adenocarcinomas remain limited. We profiled 1532 upper GI adenocarcinomas using the clinically validated VENTANA MET (SP44) IHC assay. MET was stratified by (i) 3+ membranous staining fractions (any, ≥ 10%, ≥ 50%) reflecting contemporary ADC eligibility concepts and (ii) H-score (0-300; high ≥ 150). Overall survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. High MET expression was uncommon (H-score ≥ 150: 2.3%; any 3+: 1.6%; ≥ 10% 3+: 1.3%; ≥ 50% 3+: 1.0%) and enriched in advanced T stage. MET IHC strongly predicted MET amplification (H-score ≥ 150: 63.6% amplified vs. 2.4% in negatives; any 3+: 75.0% vs. 2.6%; all p < 0.001). Any MET 3+ staining was independently associated with inferior overall survival (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.29-3.83). Most MET 3+ tumors lacked concurrent HER2 positivity, Claudin-18.2 expression, or dMMR/MSI. In the largest real-world cohort to date, MET overexpression identifies a rare, biologically aggressive subset with poor outcomes. By applying the latest MET-ADC-relevant IHC criteria (including the ≥ 10% 3+ threshold), this study provides clinically translatable prevalence estimates and supports standardized MET testing to inform prospective MET-directed ADC trials in upper GI adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.