ArticleTropical medicine and health2026
Patriarchal norms and reproductive vulnerability: association between son preference and high-risk fertility behaviour in India.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSon preference, deeply entrenched in India's sociocultural fabric, remains a critical yet under-examined structural driver of high-risk fertility behaviour (HRFB), defined as early childbearing (< 18 years), late childbearing (≥ 35 years), high parity (≥ 4 births), and short birth intervals (≤ 24 months). While national fertility has declined to replacement level, HRFB persists. DATA AND
methodsUsing nationally representative data from the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21), we analysed 229,680 women aged 15-49 with recent live births. Son preference was defined as a stated ideal number of boys exceeding that of girls. HRFB was categorized as any and multiple risks. We employed multivariable logistic regression, multinomial logistic regression, and Fairlie decomposition analysis to quantify associations and decompose disparities.
resultsWomen with son preference had 30% higher odds of any HRFB (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.27-1.34). Women with three or more daughters had higher odds of HRFB (AOR = 7.59, 95% CI: 7.26-7.93). Maternal age (≥ 35 years) was associated with higher odds of HRFB (AOR = 5.03), while larger household size with more than eight members was associated with higher odds of HRFB (AOR = 1.66). Fairlie decomposition revealed that 62.9% of the HRFB gap between women with and without son preference is explained by measurable factors, including living daughters (26.96%), maternal education (20.49%), and household wealth index (14.47%).
conclusionSon preference remains a significant structural correlate of HRFB in India. Addressing persistent gender-biased fertility norms requires integrating girl-centred education, postpartum contraception after the birth of daughters, and gender-transformative health messaging within programmes such as Mission Parivar Vikas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.