ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2026
Phenotype-specific muscle proteomic profiling in titinopathies.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Titinopathies are complex neuromuscular disorders with multiple phenotypes. The gene's size, comprising 364 exons, as well as the protein's size of 3.8 MDa and its extensive network of protein interactors, are key factors underlying this complexity. Various phenotypes characterize titinopathies, and this study focuses on two of them: arthrogryposis and myofibrillar myopathies. The protein deregulations associated with these two phenotypes remain unknown or have been minimally explored; however, understanding these consequences is essential for better characterizing the pathophysiological aspects of these titinopathies.The objective was to analyze protein deregulations in two cohorts of French patients with titinopathies exhibiting the arthrogryposis and myofibrillar myopathy phenotypes, and to compare them with control individuals. Protein extracts were obtained from muscle biopsies of patients, and changes in protein levels within these two groups were analyzed by mass spectrometry. The results indicate specific deregulations in each group. The networks analyzed revealed deregulation of proteins involved in fibrosis mechanisms or in the actomyosin complex for the arthrogryposis phenotype. Regulation of the muscle contraction system through deregulation of proteins involved in the cytoskeleton is impacted in patients with myofibrillar myopathy. The proteins that are quantitatively abnormal in these two groups also provide insights into the major signaling networks disrupted in titinopathies. These findings will contribute to a more precise characterization of titinopathies, enabling the identification of phenotype-specific biomarkers and potentially guiding the search for targeted therapies for these neuromuscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.