Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393762›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026

Computational design of low-volatility lubricants for space using interpretable machine learning.

Daniel Miliate, Ashlie Martini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel MiliateDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
Ashlie MartiniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA. amartini@ucmerced.edu.

Funding

NSF CC* 2346744NSF MRI #2019144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function and lifetime of moving mechanical assemblies (MMAs) in space depend on the properties of lubricants. MMAs that experience high speeds or high cycles require liquid-based lubricants due to their ability to reflow to the point of contact. However, only a few liquid-based lubricants have vapor pressures low enough for the vacuum conditions of space, each of which has limitations that add constraints to MMA designs. This work introduces a data-driven machine learning (ML) approach to predicting vapor pressure, enabling virtual screening and discovery of new space-suitable liquid lubricants. The ML models are trained with data from both high-throughput molecular dynamics simulations and experimental databases. The models are designed to prioritize interpretability, enabling the relationships between chemical structure and vapor pressure to be identified. Based on these insights, several candidate molecules are proposed that may have promise for future space lubricant applications in MMAs. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: This work develops interpretable machine learning models for vapor pressure of low volatility molecules, identifying the structural features that drive volatility. The framework is accurate in the ultra-low-volatility regime where existing methods are unreliable, enabling virtual screening of candidate space lubricants. All code and data are publicly available, and the approach generalizes to materials discovery in other extreme environments.

Identifiers

PMID42393762
PMCPMC13602501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.