Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393749›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026

Specific versus non-specific hospital-based spine diagnoses in children and adolescents: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Freja Gomez Overgaard, Casper Nim, Laura Montgomery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freja Gomez OvergaardMedical Spinal Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark. Frejagomez.overgaard@hdr.mq.edu.au.
Casper NimMedical Spinal Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Laura MontgomerySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric spine pain is common, yet little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on diagnostic classification in hospital settings.

objectiveDescribe diagnostic code variation by age, sex, parental spine diagnoses, and child comorbidity burden.

methodsNationwide historical (2007-2022) register-based cohort study including Danish 0-17-year-olds with a hospital-based spine-related diagnosis. Diagnoses were classified as specific or non-specific by ICD-10 codes. Patient characteristics were examined descriptively and with logistic regression.

resultsOf 49,596 children, 63% received a non-specific diagnosis. Non-specific diagnoses were more common among older children (OR ~ 0.22-0.27), children with parental spine-related diagnoses (OR = 0.77), male children (OR = 1.07), or children with lower comorbidity burden (OR ~ 1.09-1.13).

conclusionsDiagnostic classification of paediatric spinal pain varies systematically by patient characteristics. Most children receive non-specific diagnoses, underscoring the need for the development of appropriate care pathways including greater use of primary care for non-specific spinal pain.

Indexed as

Back PainAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesComorbidityDenmarkFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleRegistriesAdolescentBack painChildDiagnosisEpidemiologyHospital recordsPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID42393749
PMCPMC13525669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.