ArticleBMC nursing2026
From silence to dismissal; nursing managers' strategies in dealing with nurses' professional misconduct: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProfessional misconduct in nursing can adversely affect patient safety, the quality of care, and public trust in the nursing profession. Nursing managers play a pivotal role in addressing such misconduct. This study aimed to explore the strategies used by nursing managers in Iran when dealing with professional misconduct committed by nurses.
methodsThis qualitative study employed a content analysis approach for data collection and analysis. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with Iranian nursing managers. Participants were selected through purposive sampling.
resultsData analysis led to the identification of three main categories and nine subcategories: Protective Strategies (supportive and preventive actions), Disciplinary Strategies (warnings, written commitments, reporting to superiors, punitive measures, and dismissal), and Biased Strategies (ignoring and counteractive measures). These categories represent the range of approaches that nursing managers employ when addressing nurses' professional misconduct.
conclusionsNursing managers employ a spectrum of strategies to address professional misconduct, ranging from protective (supportive and preventive) and disciplinary (warnings, reporting, dismissal) to biased (ignoring, counteractive measures). Given the exploratory nature of this study within a specific Iranian context, these findings highlight the need for structured, context-sensitive guidelines that differentiate between human error, at-risk behavior, and reckless conduct. Developing such frameworks may help mitigate biased responses, protect whistleblowers, and support managers in handling misconduct effectively, thereby contributing to the maintenance of professional integrity and the quality of care.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.