ArticleBMC surgery2026
Revised cardiac risk index and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is increasingly performed in patients with severe rib fractures or flail chest. It has been shown to reduce ventilator days and pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, SSRF carries perioperative morbidity, particularly pulmonary and cardiac events, and the optimal preoperative cardiac risk stratification tool for this population has not been established. This study evaluated the association between the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and in-hospital mortality and cardiopulmonary complications in SSRF patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used the ACS-TQIP National Trauma Data Bank (2019-2023) to identify adult patients undergoing SSRF. Patients with AIS ≥ 2 in non-thoracic regions, blunt cardiac injury (AIS ≥ 2), or aortic injury were excluded. Because SSRF is an intrathoracic procedure, each patient carried a minimum RCRI of 1; patients were stratified into RCRI = 1, RCRI = 2, and RCRI ≥ 3. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and a composite of cardiopulmonary complications (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pneumonia, ARDS, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism). Modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors estimated adjusted risk ratios (RRs), with RCRI = 1 as the reference and adjustment for demographics, regional and chest AIS, fixation details, and comorbidities.
resultsAfter exclusions, 6,139 patients were analyzed (RCRI = 1, n = 4,678; RCRI = 2, n = 1,208; RCRI ≥ 3, n = 253). Adverse outcomes increased stepwise with higher RCRI in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Compared with RCRI = 1, RCRI ≥ 3 was associated with significantly higher adjusted risks of in-hospital mortality (RR 3.34, 95% CI 2.06-5.43, p <0.001) and cardiopulmonary complications (RR 3.42, 95% CI 2.08-5.62; both p < 0.001), as well as myocardial infarction (RR 9.28, 95% CI 2.84-30.34, p < 0.001) and pneumonia (RR 5.85, 95% CI 2.72-12.59, p < 0.001). RCRI = 2 was also associated with increased mortality (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.50-3.04, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary complications (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.20-2.48, p = 0.003).
conclusionsRCRI is a simple, readily available bedside tool that independently stratifies the risk of in-hospital mortality and cardiopulmonary complications in patients undergoing SSRF. Incorporating the RCRI into preoperative assessment may help identify high-risk patients and guide perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.