ArticleBMC health services research2026
Analyzing hospital behavior across different payment mechanism as a response to financial incentives - a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis scoping review maps published evidence on financial incentives linked to hospital payment mechanisms and on the hospital-behavior endpoint categories examined in the literature. It provides an evidence map for subsequent systematic review work within the FLASH project, rather than estimating the direction or magnitude of effects.
methodsThe review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Authors searched PubMed and Cochrane for English-language records published between January 2013 to February 2023. Data was independently screened and extracted by two authors. In total, 140 full-text records were included and classified country, publication year, payment mechanism, financial-incentive category, and endpoint category.
resultsSince 2015, the number of publications on financial incentives in healthcare has generally increased. Most included publications covered changes in the United States, Taiwan, China, and the United Kingdom. The identified incentives were mapped within payment-mechanism categories, including Activity-Based Payment, Incremental, Consolidated, and Budget mechanisms, following WHO/OECD and Urban Institute classifications. Activity-Based Payment was the most frequently studied category; the endpoint categories most often examined in this group were efficiency of spending funds (42 publications), access (27 publications), and hospitals' finances (22 publications). Studies of incremental mechanisms, mainly Pay-for-Performance (P4P), most often examined quality (41 publications) and efficiency of spending funds (24 publications), while consolidated mechanisms were represented less frequently across endpoint categories. These counts describe the distribution of the literature and do not indicate effect direction, magnitude, or statistical significance.
conclusionsThe review identifies where evidence on hospital payment mechanisms, financial incentives, and hospital-behavior endpoint categories is concentrated and where gaps remain. The most researched endpoint categories are linked to efficiency of spending funds, quality, access, and hospital finances. Payer spending and budget-based mechanisms are comparatively less represented. We identify priorities for subsequent systematic review and for a database that extracts the direction, magnitude, and context of reported effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.