ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Spatial analysis of sheep fascioliasis in rural communities of the Southern highlands of Peru.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sheep fascioliasis causes considerable economic losses globally, yet risk factors for infection in Andes Highlands remain poorly characterized. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the risk factors of sheep fascioliasis in rural communities of the Southern highlands of Peru. Data on farm and animal characteristics, management practices, and water sources were collected. Stool samples were geographically tagged and examined microscopically for Fasciola and other parasites eggs. A total of 3,518 sheep from 268 farms were evaluated, of which 40.6% (1,429/3,518) were infected with F. hepatica. Whereas 73.6% (2,591/3,518) harbored other non-Fasciola parasites. Infected sheep were typically older (2.72 ± 1.7 vs 2.25 ± 1.6; p < 0.001), had lower body condition scores (2.08 ± 0.6 vs 2.16 ± 0.6; p < 0.001), and often had prior treatment for fascioliasis (50.9% vs 49.1%; p < 0.001). Farms with infected sheep tended to have larger flock sizes (OR 1.061, 95%CI 1.007-1.119; p = 0.027) and use irrigation water as a water source (OR 2.359, 95%CI 1.000-5.563; p = 0.050), whereas were less likely to have more family members (OR 0.690, 95%CI 0.542-0.878; p = 0.003) or rely on artificial canals (OR 0.379, 95%CI 0.155-0.926; p = 0.033) than those without infection. Spatial analysis revealed heterogeneous infection distribution across the study regions. Further research is needed to validate our findings in fascioliasis transmission in the Peruvian highlands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.