ArticleBMC oral health2026
Adherence to endodontic treatment protocols in the clinical practice of Lithuanian dentists and endodontists-cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective of the studyTo evaluate contemporary endodontic practice patterns among general dental practitioners and endodontists in Lithuania, compare the clinical protocols used, and assess their adherence to international endodontic guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Lithuanian general dental practitioners and endodontists. The questionnaire addressed major stages of endodontic treatment, from isolation and canal preparation to obturation and post-treatment restoration. A total of 470 participants completed the survey (372 general dental practitioners, 77 endodontists, and 20 "other" (did not specify their professional category) responses), of whom 450 were included in the final analysis. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical variables and presented as frequencies and percentages. Associations between groups were assessed using the chi-square (χ
resultsRubber dam was used in all endodontic procedures by 101 (34.4%) of general practitioners and 65 (84.4%) of endodontists. An electronic apex locator was used by the vast majority of both general practitioners and endodontists for working length determination. Sodium hypochlorite was the most commonly used irrigant; general practitioners favored passive irrigation activation, whereas endodontists more frequently employed ultrasonic and sonic activation methods. Calcium hydroxide was the most frequently used intracanal medicament. Cold lateral condensation was more commonly used by general practitioners, while endodontists preferred warm vertical compaction and single-cone obturation techniques. Private practice was associated with higher odds of bioceramic cement use. Direct composite restorations were the most common post-endodontic restorations, with crowns used less frequently.
conclusionCompared to data from 2010, endodontic practice in Lithuania has shown greater adherence to European Society of Endodontology (ESE) and the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) guidelines. Endodontists consistently apply evidence-based methods more rigorously than general practitioners. However, insufficient rubber dam usage and variable implementation of the latest clinical protocols indicate that guideline adherence is still not routine. These findings underscore the importance of continuous professional development and application of updated recommendations in clinical practice to ensure high-quality endodontic care and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.