ArticleBMC public health2026
Identifying predictor factors for asthma using machine learning: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma is a common chronic inflammatory airway disease. Accumulating evidence highlights the roles of demographic, lifestyle, and comorbidity factors in the risk of asthma. This study aimed to identify predictor factors of asthma using machine learning approaches.
methodsData were obtained from the 10th wave (2021-2023) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Participants aged ≥ 50 years with complete information on asthma status and relevant variables were included. Baseline characteristics were compared between asthma and control groups. Subsequently, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify candidate variables. Eight machine learning algorithms were developed and compared to evaluate diagnostic performance. The optimal model was selected and used to determine key variables. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret variable contributions. Finally, a nomogram was constructed based on the key variables.
resultsA total of 3429 participants (535 asthma cases) were analyzed. Asthma was significantly associated with 19 baseline variables. LASSO regression retained 14 candidate variables. Among eight machine learning models, the Bagging Tree (BT) model achieved the highest diagnostic performance (micro-averaged area under the curve (AUC) = 0.856; macro-averaged AUC = 0.881). SHAP analysis identified alcohol consumption, marital status, and disease lung as the most influential variables. A total of 11 key variables were identified by the BT model, including marital status, vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, alcohol consumption, frequency of feeling isolated, depression, headache, activity limitations, disease lung, arthritis, and psychiatric disease. The nomogram showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.0857), but its discriminatory ability was moderate (AUC = 0.662).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that socio-behavioral factors, psychological distress, and respiratory comorbidities played important roles in asthma risk stratification. Machine learning with multidimensional variables offers a useful exploratory framework for identifying potential predictor factors and generating hypotheses for asthma prevention, although its predictive accuracy remains moderate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.