ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Predicting risk of unplanned subsequent knee surgery following ACL reconstruction.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of natural language processing pipelines to extract injury and surgery-related data elements from ACL reconstruction operative reports.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), unplanned subsequent knee surgeries are disruptive and costly. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with any subsequent knee surgery as well as specific surgical procedures, including revision, contralateral ACLR, surgery for meniscus injury, or procedure for loss of motion following primary ACLR using data from the electronic health record (EHR) of a large single-system health network.
methodsData for individuals (≥14 years old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2013 and June 2021 were extracted from the EHR. Potential patient and surgical predictors were identified from structured data and/or extracted from the ACLR operative report using natural language processing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with the overall risk of subsequent knee surgery as well as specific surgical procedures (p < 0.05). Incidence per 100 person-years was reported.
resultsFrom an initial sample of 6,121 individuals, 3,478 (median 21.8 years old [IQR 17.4, 32.9]; 44.2% female) underwent primary ACLR and were eligible for this study. The incidence rate per 100 person-years was 12.3 for any subsequent knee surgery, 2.7 for revision, 2.3 for contralateral ACLR, 4.3 for subsequent meniscus surgery, and 2.7 for subsequent procedure for loss of motion. No model was successful in identifying risk factors associated with any subsequent knee surgery. Risk factors associated with revision included younger age, medium surgeon volume compared with high volume (12-45 mean cases/year vs. ≥ 46), and sex as a time-varying coefficient (TVC), indicating females were initially at lower risk but risk increased with time. The only significant risk factor identified for subsequent contralateral ACLR was younger age as a TVC. Significant risk factors for subsequent meniscus surgery included younger age, medium surgeon volume compared with high volume, and medial meniscus repair at the time of primary ACLR. Risk factors for subsequent procedure for loss of motion included female sex, Black race, lateral meniscus repair, and quadriceps tendon autograft, while medial meniscectomy was found to be protective compared with no medial meniscus surgery.
conclusionsRisk factors varied by specific type of subsequent surgery following primary ACLR. Specifically, younger age was a risk factor for future ACL surgery, medium surgeon volume was associated with an increased risk of revision and subsequent meniscus surgery, medial meniscus repair was a risk factor for subsequent meniscus surgery, and lateral meniscus repair was a risk factor for a subsequent procedure for loss of motion. Consideration of risk factors relevant to subsequent surgeries beyond revision alone may better inform patient counseling prior to ACLR, as well as risk stratification and individualized post-operative rehabilitation following ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.