Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393555›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026

Stakeholder perspectives on implementing ED time series forecasting: a qualitative interview study.

Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Janez Žibert, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luka PetravićDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, UKC Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, Maribor, 2000, Slovenia. lpetravic@me.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7087-7316
Kaja Gril RoginaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-7652
Janez ŽibertNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva cesta 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-5431
Tit AlbrehtDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-4381
Andreja KukecDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-8409

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P3-0429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency departments (EDs) around the globe are experiencing increasing patient attendance and staffing challenges, making it difficult for management to balance supply and demand. Time series forecasting (TSF) is a statistical technique that uses historical data and external variables to predict phenomena over time. Given the growing interest in TSF applications in emergency care, the aim of this study was to explore how these technologies could be aligned with everyday clinical demands to close the translational science gap.

methodsThis was a prospective qualitative interview study. Through interviews with European emergency department directors, we collected and analysed perspectives on the practical applicability of time series forecasting in everyday emergency care. The study is reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

resultsWe interviewed 26 ED directors in 19 countries. Over half had prior knowledge of time series forecasting technology. Only three countries had TSF implemented in daily practice. Most ED directors reported that their management decisions are informed by data and indicated openness to the adoption of additional decision-support tools, such as TSF. Novel, previously undescribed external variables were identified, including local primary care availability, fruit harvesting, and neighbouring hospital conditions (e.g. ED closures).

conclusionsWe recommend that future TSF modelling studies in ED implement, at a minimum, both short- and long-term forecast horizons; conduct in-depth interviews with local senior staff to align models with operational needs; and validate models using real-world data from deployment sites. Through semi-structured interviews, we identified key directions for further TSF model development to enhance usability and support translation from academia into clinical practice. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was preregistered via Open Science Framework site ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SGZH7 ).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalEuropeForecastingHumansInterviews as TopicProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchBoardingDecision support systemEmergency department directorsEmergency departmentsEuropeInterview studyOvercrowdingPersonnel staffing and schedulingTime seriesTime series forecastingTranslational science

Identifiers

PMID42393555
PMCPMC13499326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.