ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Stakeholder perspectives on implementing ED time series forecasting: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency departments (EDs) around the globe are experiencing increasing patient attendance and staffing challenges, making it difficult for management to balance supply and demand. Time series forecasting (TSF) is a statistical technique that uses historical data and external variables to predict phenomena over time. Given the growing interest in TSF applications in emergency care, the aim of this study was to explore how these technologies could be aligned with everyday clinical demands to close the translational science gap.
methodsThis was a prospective qualitative interview study. Through interviews with European emergency department directors, we collected and analysed perspectives on the practical applicability of time series forecasting in everyday emergency care. The study is reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
resultsWe interviewed 26 ED directors in 19 countries. Over half had prior knowledge of time series forecasting technology. Only three countries had TSF implemented in daily practice. Most ED directors reported that their management decisions are informed by data and indicated openness to the adoption of additional decision-support tools, such as TSF. Novel, previously undescribed external variables were identified, including local primary care availability, fruit harvesting, and neighbouring hospital conditions (e.g. ED closures).
conclusionsWe recommend that future TSF modelling studies in ED implement, at a minimum, both short- and long-term forecast horizons; conduct in-depth interviews with local senior staff to align models with operational needs; and validate models using real-world data from deployment sites. Through semi-structured interviews, we identified key directions for further TSF model development to enhance usability and support translation from academia into clinical practice. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was preregistered via Open Science Framework site ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SGZH7 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.