Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393554›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Labor support in low- and middle-income countries - transformative impact of birth companions and doulas on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a narrative review.

Prosper Akankwasa, Jackson Kakooza, John Katongole, Esther Namutosi, Ahmed Aisha Abdullahi, Catherine R Lewis, Emmanuel Okurut

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prosper AkankwasaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
Jackson KakoozaDepartment of Surgery, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
John KatongoleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
Esther NamutosiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
Ahmed Aisha AbdullahiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
Catherine R LewisDepartment of Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital Kitovu, PO Box 524, Masaka, Uganda. cathymdphd@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-178X
Emmanuel OkurutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality remain disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), partly due to inadequate intrapartum support, psychosocial stress, and disrespectful maternity care. Continuous labor support from birth companions or doulas offers a low-cost, high-impact intervention with demonstrated benefits in high-income settings, yet LMIC-focused evidence remains fragmented. This review synthesizes current evidence on the effects of birth companionship and doula care on maternal, neonatal, psychosocial, and implementation outcomes in LMICs.

methodsA narrative review was conducted using structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Lens.org, and WHO documents. Eligible studies were published between 2015 and 2025, conducted in LMICs or relevant to LMIC contexts, and reported empirical findings on continuous intrapartum support from informal companions, trained lay companions, or professional doulas. Data were synthesized thematically across maternal, neonatal, psychosocial, and implementation domains. A structured narrative appraisal was used due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures.

resultsA total of 27 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. These comprised 8 primary studies in LMICs, 6 high-income country (HIC) studies involving marginalized populations, and 13 systematic reviews. Continuous labor support was consistently associated with shorter labor, higher rates of spontaneous vaginal birth, reduced use of pharmacologic analgesia and oxytocin augmentation, and lower maternal anxiety and stress markers. Neonatal benefits included higher Apgar scores, earlier breastfeeding initiation, and enhanced mother-infant bonding. Psychosocial improvements were mediated through emotional reassurance, advocacy, improved communication, and culturally responsive support. Implementation barriers identified across LMIC studies included provider resistance, facility space limitations, inadequate training, and sociocultural constraints, while facilitators included community engagement, structured companion training, and phased integration into maternity systems. Evidence quality varied widely, with few LMIC-specific randomized trials and heterogeneous operational definitions of "continuous support."

conclusionsEvidence demonstrates that birth companions and doulas improve maternal well-being, early neonatal outcomes, and respectful maternity care in LMIC settings. Effective scale-up requires context-adapted implementation strategies, provider orientation, policy alignment, and rigorous LMIC-based trials assessing clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and equity impacts. Companion-inclusive intrapartum care represents a feasible, low-cost strategy for strengthening quality and experience of maternity care in resource-limited health systems.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricDoulasFriendsLabor, ObstetricSocial SupportDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyResource-Limited SettingsBirth companionsContinuous labor supportDoulasLow- and middle-income countriesMaternal outcomesNeonatal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42393554
PMCPMC13595778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.