ArticleBiological procedures online2026
Development and Comparison of Two Rabbit Tibiofemoral Joint Replacement Models.
Article in Biological procedures online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoint arthroplasty, replacement of damaged articular surfaces with a prosthetic component, is an increasingly common orthopaedic procedure. Despite the overall success of arthroplasty, complications such as periprosthetic joint infection remain a persistent problem with severe consequences. With increasing clinical demands, the need for a reliable, reproducible model for testing therapeutic strategies for arthroplasty complications is fundamental.
resultsIn this study, a novel small animal model was designed and evaluated for downstream investigations. Two different implant designs (tibial vs. femoral) and surgical approaches were compared. The femoral implant resulted in fewer complications such as knee joint destabilization, severe swelling, and erosion of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Rabbit care methodology was also optimized during model development, and both the process and results are presented to promote ethical and reproducible preclinical model research.
conclusionsThe custom porous coated unicondylar femoral implant with a polished condylar surface demonstrated far fewer complications and adverse events than the tibial implant, as well as robust osseointegration. This will serve as a model for future investigations in preventing and treating joint arthroplasty complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.