ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Surgical Options for Cranial Nerve Functional Diseases.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranial nerve (CN) functional diseases, comprising trigeminal neuralgia (TN), hemifacial spasm (HFS), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN), are frequently caused by neurovascular conflicts (NVCs) in the posterior fossa. This chapter examines surgical and non-surgical procedures for these conditions, emphasizing minimally invasive retrosigmoid approach (RA) for microvascular decompression (MVD) as the gold standard for definitive treatment for all of them. MVD achieves long-term pain relief in more than 80% of classical TN cases, though efficacy decreases significantly in multiple sclerosis (MS)-related TN. Technical nuances of MVD, such as patient positioning, craniectomy location, and conflict visualization via microscopic, endoscopic, or exoscopic systems, are detailed, alongside strategies to minimize complications (CSF leakage, vascular or nerve injuries). Percutaneous techniques (radiofrequency thermorhizotomy, balloon compression) and stereotactic radiosurgery offer viable alternatives, albeit with variable durability on symptoms control. Special considerations for MS-related TN, tumor-associated cases, and recurrent disease underscore the need for tailored algorithms integrating intraoperative imaging and tools. Advances in endoscopic and exoscopic visualization systems enhance intraoperative precision and ergonomics, though mastery remains technically demanding. A multidisciplinary framework is critical for optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.