ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are a safe and effective method for treating skull base lesions, including those in the sellar and parasellar areas. Pioneered initially for the treatment of skull base pathology in adults, these approaches have shown clear advantages including cost-effectiveness, limited blood loss, and improved visualization allowing for a better plane of dissection and clearing anatomical landmarks. However, in younger patients, this approach could be limited due to their developing anatomy, small anatomical corridors, or peculiarities of specific lesions which could not be amenable for a simple approach.The width of the piriform aperture, sphenoid bone pneumatization, and intercarotid distances at different coronal planes should all be considered during preoperative evaluation of pediatric patients for EEAs. EEAs below the age of 2 years at parasellar ICA level and below 4 years at paraclinoid ICA level should deserve particular attention. As children grow, the progressive pneumatization of paranasal sinuses expands the anatomy of these corridors and it is generally assumed that anatomical factors would not restrict an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach in children older than 5 years of age.The pediatric population offers unique challenges because of the smaller working spaces and the smaller size of the skull base involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.