ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Surgical Approaches to Pineal Region Tumors.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pineal region tumors represent a diverse group of neoplasms arising from the pineal gland and its surrounding structures, posing unique diagnostic and surgical challenges due to their deep midline location and proximity to critical venous and neural anatomy. Advances in neuroimaging, microsurgical technique, and endoscopic technology have transformed their management, substantially improving outcomes compared to historical experiences of high morbidity and mortality. This chapter reviews the anatomical, diagnostic, and surgical principles essential to the contemporary management of pineal region lesions. Detailed descriptions are provided for key operative corridors, including the endoscopic third ventriculostomy with biopsy, supracerebellar infratentorial, occipital transtentorial, posterior interhemispheric transsplenial, anterior transchoroidal, and combined supra-/infratentorial approaches. Institutional experience and outcome data are presented to guide approach selection. Ultimately, optimal management depends on an individualized, anatomy-driven strategy integrating tumor pathology, patient presentation, and the surgeon's familiarity with each corridor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.