Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393444›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026

Controversies in Treatment Methodologies in Cerebrovascular Surgery.

Ahmed Ansari, Alberto Feletti, Yoko Kato

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed AnsariDepartment of Neurosurgery, JawaharLal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India.
Alberto FelettiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona - AOUI, Verona, Italy.
Yoko KatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrovascular surgery has shifted a lot from the microsurgical aspects to the endovascular surgeries in nearly most of the cases. However, there are still some major controversies when one sees the long-term follow-up of microsurgical and endovascular procedures.MC aneurysms, PICA VA junction and PICA aneurysms, IC aneurysms with good cross flow (trapping), revascularisation surgery, dural AVF (coagulation or coiling), ICH evacuation timing, and recent changes in mechanical thrombectomy timing are a few of these examples. This chapter will comprehensively aim to provide an outlook on the best possible modality in these controversial aspects of cerebrovascular surgery.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular DisordersEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmNeurosurgical ProceduresCerebral RevascularizationHumansMicrosurgeryAneurysmBypassCerebrovascular surgeryClippingCoilingDural AVFIntracerebral hematomaRevascularisation

Identifiers

PMID42393444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.