ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026
Synergistic pain relief in cervical radiculopathy: A randomized trial of topical methylcobalamin gel with phonophoresis and Mulligan mobilization.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCervical radiculopathy is a neuropathic disorder caused by nerve root compression that presents as pain that refers to the upper limb, numbness, and weakness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical MeCbl gel 6% w/w formulation by phonophoresis along with Mulligan traction/mobilization, compared to Mulligan mobilization alone. PATIENTS AND
methodsA single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted in Pakistan between November 2024 and April 2025, involving 370 (consented) patients with cervical radiculopathy. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A received treatment of MeCbl gel, along with phonophoresis plus Mulligan traction and mobilization, whereas Group B received Mulligan traction and mobilization with topical MeCbl gel without phonophoresis. Both groups received 12 sessions over a period of four weeks. Outcomes were measured using the validated 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a measure of pain intensity, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), which measures cervical functional impairment on a scale from 0 to 50.
resultsThe outcome demonstrated significantly increased pain reductions (NPRS, p < 0.01) and disability (NDI, p < 0.01) in Group A compared to Group B, along with an improvement in cervical range of motion (p < 0.02).
conclusionThe findings of this study suggests that efficacy of MeCbl gel application by phonophoresis in combination with Mulligan manual therapy is higher when compared with conventional MeCbl gel application and Mulligan manual therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. The improved results from the use of phonophoresis are most probably due to increased absorption of medication and its deep penetration into the tissues.
trial registrationIranian registry of clinical trial IRCT20241220064105N2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.