Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393366›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Lean Unet: a compact model for image segmentation.

Ture Hassler, Ida Åkerholm, Marcus Nordström, Gabriele Balletti, Orcun Goksel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ture HasslerDept of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ida ÅkerholmDept of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marcus NordströmRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gabriele BallettiRaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
Orcun GokselDept of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. orcun.goksel@it.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-7373

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2024-05664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnet and its variations have been standard in semantic image segmentation, especially for computer-assisted radiology. Current Unet architectures iteratively downsample spatial resolution while increasing channel dimensions to preserve information content. Such a structure demands a large memory footprint, limiting training batch sizes, and increasing inference latency. Channel pruning compresses Unet architecture without accuracy loss, but requires lengthy optimization and may not generalize across tasks and datasets.

methodsBy investigating Unet pruning, we hypothesize that the final structure is the crucial factor, not the channel selection strategy of pruning. Based on our observations, we propose a lean Unet architecture (LUnet) with a compact, flat hierarchy where channels are not doubled as resolution is halved.

resultsWe evaluate on a public MRI dataset allowing comparable reporting, as well as on two internal CT datasets. We show that a state-of-the-art pruning solution (STAMP+) mainly prunes from the layers with the highest number of channels. Comparatively, simply eliminating a random channel at the pruning-identified layer or at the largest layer achieves similar or better performance. Our proposed LUnet with fixed architectures and over 30 times fewer parameters achieves performance comparable to both conventional Unet counterparts and data-adaptively pruned networks.

conclusionsThe proposed lean Unet with constant channel count across layers requires far fewer parameters while achieving performance superior to standard Unet for the same total number of parameters. Skip connections allow Unet bottleneck channels to be largely reduced, unlike standard encoder-decoder architectures requiring increased bottleneck channels for information propagation.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansInformation bottleneckMedical image segmentationNetwork compressionPruning

Identifiers

PMID42393366
PMCPMC13553731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.