Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hallmarks of social action in the vocal turn-taking of wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Filipa Abreu, Nicola Schiel, Antonio Souto, Simone Pika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filipa AbreuComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany. filipa.abreu@uni-osnabrueck.de.
Nicola SchielLaboratório de Etologia Teórica e Aplicada, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.
Antonio SoutoLaboratório de Etologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.
Simone PikaComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversational turn-taking, the orderly exchange of signals between individuals, is considered an important component of human communication and language. Comparative studies of vocal turn-taking have often been biased toward a limited number of model species and have usually examined only single call types, restricted features of human conversational turn-taking, or captive animals, thereby limiting broader understanding of turn-taking complexity and its evolutionary trajectory. Here we show that wild common marmosets engage in structured vocal exchanges that share several basic features with human conversational turn-taking. We analyzed 1,245 natural vocal interactions and found that individuals can produce multi-turn exchanges with matched call types. Marmosets used different vocalizations when interacting with group members compared to neighboring groups. These interactions were characterized by flexible turn organization, recurring call sequences, relatively short gaps between turns (approximately 1,300 ms), and structured participation involving specific individuals. Altogether, our findings highlight the complexity of vocal interaction in wild common marmosets, providing a broader view of coordination across the whole vocal repertoire and suggesting that elements of human conversational turn-taking may be present in this species and may be shared, at least in part, with other primates.

Indexed as

CallithrixSocial BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleCallithrix jacchusCall typesIntergroup communicationLanguage evolutionPrimatesVocal exchanges

Identifiers

PMID42393355
PMCPMC13328666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.