Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393341›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026

BoneCoT: multicentre validation of a whole-body skeleton foundation model for bone metastases guided by clinician-derived chain of thought.

Hui Zhao, Ruipeng Zhang, Zhiyu Wang, Yifeng Gu, Shengyuan Xu, Sheng Wang, Yuehua Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui Zhao *Metastatic Bone Tumor Clinical Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhao-hui@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-2458
Ruipeng Zhang *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-4987
Zhiyu Wang *Metastatic Bone Tumor Clinical Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-1516
Yifeng GuInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shengyuan XuMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6838-6200
Sheng WangPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. swang@cs.washington.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-5199
Yuehua LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. liyuehua77@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-248X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the rising incidence of bone metastases, computed tomography is widely used worldwide as the initial imaging modality for their detection. Accurate diagnosis of bone metastases demands comprehensive evaluation, yet divergent interpretations among specialists can result in diagnostic discrepancies. In clinical practice, precision diagnosis of bone metastases necessitates multidisciplinary collaboration involving radiologists, pathologists and oncologists. Here, to meet the need for an automated tool that can deliver expert-level insights and predictions by jointly considering multidisciplinary information, we propose BoneCoT, a whole-body skeleton foundation model enhanced through a chain-of-thought (CoT) fine-tuning approach. We pretrained the model on 29.3 million computed tomography images from 30,267 patients across 12 skeletal sites and refined it over a graph of 26 clinically relevant tasks spanning diagnosis, complications, tumour type and biomarkers. Evaluated across 26 tasks and multicentre cohorts from 10 hospitals, BoneCoT outperformed state-of-the-art methods by 20% in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Critically, BoneCoT achieved a 40% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve improvement in distinguishing primary from metastatic lesions, significantly surpassing experienced radiologists. These findings show how clinician-derived reasoning can move artificial intelligence towards more integrated diagnostic assessment in complex disease.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.