ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
BoneCoT: multicentre validation of a whole-body skeleton foundation model for bone metastases guided by clinician-derived chain of thought.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the rising incidence of bone metastases, computed tomography is widely used worldwide as the initial imaging modality for their detection. Accurate diagnosis of bone metastases demands comprehensive evaluation, yet divergent interpretations among specialists can result in diagnostic discrepancies. In clinical practice, precision diagnosis of bone metastases necessitates multidisciplinary collaboration involving radiologists, pathologists and oncologists. Here, to meet the need for an automated tool that can deliver expert-level insights and predictions by jointly considering multidisciplinary information, we propose BoneCoT, a whole-body skeleton foundation model enhanced through a chain-of-thought (CoT) fine-tuning approach. We pretrained the model on 29.3 million computed tomography images from 30,267 patients across 12 skeletal sites and refined it over a graph of 26 clinically relevant tasks spanning diagnosis, complications, tumour type and biomarkers. Evaluated across 26 tasks and multicentre cohorts from 10 hospitals, BoneCoT outperformed state-of-the-art methods by 20% in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Critically, BoneCoT achieved a 40% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve improvement in distinguishing primary from metastatic lesions, significantly surpassing experienced radiologists. These findings show how clinician-derived reasoning can move artificial intelligence towards more integrated diagnostic assessment in complex disease.
Identifiers
42393341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.