ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026
A genomic and epigenomic lens into the biology of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid progenitor cells. Advances in genomic and epigenomic profiling have enabled the identification of over 40 molecular subtypes defined by distinct genetic drivers, transcriptional programmes and regulatory alterations. These insights have refined the classification, particularly of B cell precursor ALL (B-ALL) and are increasingly informing risk stratification, therapeutic decision-making and disease monitoring. By contrast, the classification of T cell ALL (T-ALL) has historically relied on immunophenotypic criteria, but recent large-scale genomic studies have uncovered biologically defined subtypes driven by diverse coding and noncoding alterations. Many genomic lesions represent clinically actionable vulnerabilities, including kinase-activating alterations that have enabled the use of targeted therapies. However, treatment resistance remains a major challenge, arising through clonal evolution, acquisition of secondary mutations and adaptive transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming. In this Review, we highlight recent advances in understanding of the biological basis of ALL, with a focus on recently identified genetic alterations, gene expression patterns, alterations in three-dimensional genome architecture and epigenetic regulation that drive ALL initiation, progression and therapeutic response. Furthermore, we discuss how genetic heterogeneity contributes to clinical variability and how integrating molecular and biological insights can improve risk stratification and therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.