ArticleCommunications biology2026
Neural effects of expectation violation generalise across sensory modalities.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain receives more sensory information than it can usefully employ to control behaviour. This sensory overload can be reduced by exploiting regularities in the environment to predict future events. Previous work on the role of prediction in perception has mostly focused on events within a single sensory modality. Here, we asked whether expectation violations in one sensory modality (audition) can affect neural representations of stimuli in a separate modality (vision). Human observers viewed rapid sequences of randomly-oriented visual gratings together with a task-irrelevant stream of alternating high- and low-pitched tones. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure functional brain activity, we verified a robust neural mismatch response to unexpected sounds, consistent with previous studies. Critically, using machine learning to extract neural orientation tuning to gratings, we observed stronger tuning following unexpected sounds, suggesting that unimodal mismatches trigger cross-modal updating. The findings suggest that predictive coding theories of perception should incorporate cross-modal influences on internal models of the sensory environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42393265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.