In one paragraphArticle in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
16 authors.
Paula Fernández-Rodríguez *Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-5389 Pablo Franco-Rosado *Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-069X Patricia Diaz-GalvanUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-5585 Laura Muñoz-DelgadoUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-1824 Antonio Cristobal Luque-AmbrosianiUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0689-049X Miguel Ángel Labrador-EspinosaUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-1777 Jesús Silva-RodríguezUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-0103 Elena Ojeda-LepeUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0054-7869 Daniel Macías-GarcíaUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-1529 Astrid Adarmes-GómezUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-9289 Silvia JesúsUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-4628 Fátima CarrilloUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.
Jose Antonio Lojo-RamírezServicio de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-8250 David García SolisServicio de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain.
Michel J GrotheUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain. mgrothe@fundacioncien.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-9022 Pablo MirUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, 41013, Spain. pmir@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-302X Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
purposeTo evaluate whether semiquantitative striatal [¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECT-derived metrics improve clinical differentiation of degenerative parkinsonism using an integrated machine learning approach.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 487 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 219 with atypical parkinsonisms (APS), classified as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, n = 127), multiple system atrophy parkinsonian type (MSA-P, n = 37), multiple system atrophy cerebellar type (MSA-C, n = 12), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD, n = 43). All participants underwent a [¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECT. Striatal [¹²³I]FP-CIT uptake was quantified using anatomical (caudate, putamen, ventral striatum) and functional (limbic, executive, sensorimotor) parcellations to calculate specific binding ratios, asymmetry indices, and inter-regional ratios. Discriminative performance of each metric was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analyses. A random forest classifier integrating all semiquantitative metrics was trained and validated, enabling data-driven identification diagnostic pathways.
resultsCaudate-to-putamen and sensorimotor-to-limbic inter-regional ratios showed the strongest discriminative performance (AUC up to 0.95) for differentiating PD from APS. The random forest achieved a 64% overall accuracy with high per-class specificities (> 84%) and revealed two diagnostic pathways. A lower caudate-to-posterior putamen ratio, primarily grouped PSP, CBD and MSA-C, where lower contralateral sensorimotor uptake pointing to PSP while higher values and ipsilateral caudate uptake subregion further distinguishing CBD from MSA-C. A higher caudate-to-posterior putamen ratio, included PD and MSA-P, where lower ipsilateral caudate uptake together with a higher sensorimotor-to-cognitive ratio mainly differentiate both groups.
conclusionsIntegrating anatomical and functional [¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECT metrics within a machine learning framework enhances the clinical differentiation of degenerative parkinsonisms and supports [¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECT as a robust in vivo disease biomarker.
Indexed as
Machine LearningParkinson DiseaseParkinsonian DisordersTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDopaminergic ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneTropanes[¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECTAtypical parkinsonian syndromesDopamine transporterIn vivo biomarkerMachine learningParkinson’s disease
Identifiers
PMID42393224
PMCPMC13633342
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390