ArticleScientific reports2026
ML-based electromyography signal analysis for assessing rehabilitation exercise execution quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following lower limb trauma, performing orthopaedic rehabilitation exercises is a crucial factor in successful recovery. However, many patients find it difficult to execute these movements with optimal biomechanical form. To address this problem, an electromyography-based sensor system combined with machine learning is proposed. This system records and analyses exercises performed with the aim of providing real-time feedback on execution quality. To evaluate the potential of this concept, high-density electromyographic data (32 electrodes per sensor pad) were recorded from the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles while performing rehabilitation exercises. Four different exercises (squat, hip abduction, leg raises and rocking) were performed, each in one optimal and three non-optimal variations, by n = 19 participants, resulting in 3,040 exercise executions and 194,560 electromyographic recordings. Analysis of this dataset demonstrated that a Support Vector Machine algorithm can be used to classify execution quality (four classes per exercise) with an average accuracy of 83.3% (± 8.8%). In addition, it was shown that, One Class Support Vector Machine trained with solely optimal executions, an unknown exercise could be identified as either optimal or non-optimal execution with an accuracy of 76.6% (± 5.9%). These results highlight the potential of this approach to evaluate exercise execution quality during rehabilitation. In the long term, this approach could provide personalised rehabilitation feedback and improve patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.