ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Explainable machine learning to predict immunotherapy outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma - Meet-URO 15-AI study.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains clinically challenging because of heterogeneous outcomes and limited predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. We performed an explainable machine learning analysis using data from the multicenter retrospective Meet-URO 15 study, including 571 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line or later nivolumab. Clinical and inflammatory variables were used to develop classification models for disease control rate, progression-free survival at 3 and 9 months, and overall survival at 6, 18 and 24 months, as well as survival models for continuous progression-free and overall survival. Model performance was assessed using weighted F1-score for classification and concordance index for survival analysis, with interpretability provided through Shapley additive explanations. The best classification performance was observed for 6-month overall survival using a support vector machine model combined with minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection, achieving an F1-score of 0.81 on the test set and 0.77 in external validation. In survival analysis, random survival forest achieved a test-set concordance index of 0.68 for overall survival. Inflammatory indices, IMDC score, hemoglobin, lymphocytes and platelets consistently emerged as relevant prognostic features. These findings support explainable machine learning as a transparent approach to refine outcome prediction in immunotherapy-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Identifiers
42393181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.