ArticleScientific reports2026
Sex differences in marathon pacing: analysis of 873,000 Berlin marathon runners reveals men are twice as likely to "hit the wall".
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine whether sex differences in marathon pacing strategies and susceptibility to catastrophic deceleration ("hitting the wall") persist in a massive, high-performance dataset, and to quantify this risk across different performance levels. We analyzed 873,334 finishers from the Berlin Marathon (1999-2025). Pacing stability was quantified using the percentage slowdown in the second half relative to the first. "Hitting the wall" was operationally defined as a deceleration of ≥ 20%. A stratified analysis was performed to compare risks between sexes across five performance categories (Competitive to Casual). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and performance category, sensitivity analyses (deduplicated subset; alternative thresholds), and fine-grained pacing metrics from 5 km splits were also conducted. Male runners exhibited significantly greater mean deceleration (10.73% ± 11.41%) compared with female runners (8.34% ± 8.91%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of "hitting the wall" was nearly double in men (17.63%) compared with women (9.66%), corresponding to a crude Odds Ratio of 2.00 (95% CI 1.97 to 2.03); after adjustment for age and performance category, the disparity strengthened (adjusted OR = 3.88, 95% CI 3.81 to 3.94). The risk disparity widened among the fastest runners: in the Competitive (< 3 h) category, male runners were approximately six times more likely to experience catastrophic deceleration than their female counterparts (1.42% vs 0.23%). The gap was stable across the 27-year archive (Mann-Kendall τ = 0.14, p = 0.33). Despite faster finish times, men demonstrate significantly less stable pacing strategies and a twofold higher crude risk of catastrophic deceleration compared with women, with the disparity most pronounced among the fastest runners. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that behavioral and strategic factors contribute alongside physiological determinants to sex differences in marathon outcomes, and provide a quantitative basis for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.