Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42393134›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Pushing the boundaries of robotic computed tomography: automated twin-robot CT scan with maximum reachability.

Jonas Schnitzer, Vinayaka Raju Sathyanarayana Raju, Nihat Emir Erdebil, Gabriel Herl, Andreas Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas SchnitzerFriedrich-Alexander-University, Pattern Recognition Lab, Erlangen, 91058, Martenstraße 3, Bayern, Germany. Jonas.M.Schnitzer@FAU.de.
Vinayaka Raju Sathyanarayana RajuTU Dortmund, Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto-Hahn-Straße 4, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Nihat Emir ErdebilTU München, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Germany.
Gabriel HerlDeggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, 94469, Dieter-Görlitz Platz 1, Germany.
Andreas MaierFriedrich-Alexander-University, Pattern Recognition Lab, Erlangen, 91058, Martenstraße 3, Bayern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography is a widely used imaging method for non-destructive testing. However, standard CT systems face fundamental limitations when scanning large objects such as car bodies, which must fit between the X-ray source and detector, both of which need freedom of movement around the specimen. Twin-robotic CT systems with high degrees of freedom address these limitations by enabling free positioning of the X-ray source and detector in space, making non-destructive CT testing of large objects feasible. However, achieving collision-free positioning of the robots is a challenging problem that is often neglected in theoretical representations of twin-robot CT configurations. This paper presents a systematic methodology for performing region-of-interest scans on large objects. The approach exploits the test object's geometry to determine robot reachability, which serves as the foundation for trajectory planning by incorporating accessible regions. By leveraging both rotational and translational degrees of freedom, including variable source-detector distances and detector rotations, the methodology expands the range of collision-free poses, thereby increasing reachability and enabling more flexible trajectory design. The methodology is modular and adapts to arbitrary system configurations and test samples via computer-aided design (CAD)-based geometry definition, where the test object determines the collision-free workspace. It is demonstrated on a BMW 4-series body-in-white through comprehensive batch simulation across 273 Region of Interest (ROI) positions, evaluating reachability improvements achieved through the introduced degrees of freedom using a data completeness trajectory optimization criterion.

Indexed as

Automotive inspectionDigital twin simulationInverse kinematicsNon-destructive testingRobotic CT systemsTrajectory planning

Identifiers

PMID42393134
PMCPMC13328304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.