ArticleScientific reports2026
LiteDriveNet for driver distraction classification using a lightweight multi-scale convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distracted driving is a critical global concern and a major factor in numerous road collisions. To mitigate these issues, this article introduces a novel model, LiteDriveNet, a resource-efficient 16-layer convolutional neural network with a compact size of 1.71 MB, designed for precise image identification and behavioral analysis. The architecture incorporates multi-scale receptive blending, progressive feature enhancement, and hierarchical feature aggregation to achieve robust feature extraction. To assess the model performance, a dataset named DistractedDrivingSet_v1 is also proposed, comprising 6075 outdoor images across 8 distinctive classes, captured under real-world lighting conditions such as sunlight and shadows. LiteDriveNet's efficacy was further verified using two publicly available benchmark datasets, the State Farm Distracted Driver Detection (SFD3) dataset and the American University in Cairo (AUC) version 2. Experimental findings show that LiteDriveNet consistently surpasses both accuracy and computational efficiency compared to existing state-of-the-art, lightweight, and neural architecture search-based (NAS) models. LiteDriveNet achieves average validation accuracy improvements of 16.53% on DistractedDrivingSet_v1, 6.70% on SFD3, 10.91% on AUCv2 Camera1, and 28.97% on AUCv2 Camera2. An ablation study also proves that LiteDriveNet is an eminent lightweight model for distracted driver recognition, as it is highly suitable for real-time environments compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.