ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2026
Results of Third-Line Therapy in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe historical results in adults with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second relapse treated with third-line therapy (Salvage 2) are extremely poor. Using standard chemotherapy resulted in complete response rates of 20% and a median overall survival of 2 to 3 months. This may be changing with the recent availability of novel therapeutic strategies, including targeted antibodies and engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as well as more potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. STUDY
aimsAnalyze the outcome of adults with Ph-positive ALL with different modalities in Salvage 2. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 89 adults with Ph-positive ALL in Salvage 2 treated from 1992 until 2025 were analyzed.
resultsThe complete remission (CR) rate was 58%; the 3-year survival rate was 17%. By multivariate analysis, the most significant independent favorable predictors for CR and survival were the type of therapy utilized. Among 27 patients treated since 2017, the CR rate was 89% and the 3-year survival rate 52%.
conclusionsAdults with Ph-positive ALL in Salvage 2 receiving third-line therapy now have reasonable outcome expectations with the newer strategies available in the past decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.