ArticleJapan journal of nursing science : JJNS2026
Psychiatric nurses' clinical decision-making for adults clinically judged to have childhood maltreatment-related attachment difficulties: A qualitative study employing the steps for coding and theorization method.
Article in Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo describe how experienced psychiatric nurses notice, interpret, and respond to adult inpatients whom they clinically judge to have childhood maltreatment-related attachment difficulties and to clarify the practical reasoning underlying these judgments.
methodsEleven experienced psychiatric nurses from two private psychiatric hospitals in Japan were purposively sampled. Participant observation and semi-structured interviews focused on care of adults clinically understood to have childhood maltreatment-related attachment difficulties. Case identification relied on nurses' clinical judgment and routine team discussions or record information; no standardized attachment assessment or independent verification of childhood maltreatment history was used. Data were analyzed using the steps for coding and theorization (SCAT) method.
resultsSCAT generated 54 themes or concepts organized into 10 categories and 24 subcategories. Nurses noticed recurrent relational patterns, including distrust, checking behavior, dependency-aggression cycles, misinterpretation of staff intentions, self-harm, and distress around proximity, and adjusted their responses to stabilize the patient-nurse dyad, avoid re-traumatization, support emotional expression, and coordinate team care. Only a limited subset of subcategories was attachment-specific; many others reflected broader psychiatric nursing practices applied through an attachment-informed lens. A trauma-focused noticing process was visible in nurses' attention to nonverbal cues and early behavioral change.
conclusionsThe findings describe situated clinical reasoning rather than a new diagnostic technique or intervention model. Experienced psychiatric nurses adapted everyday psychiatric nursing practices to relational patterns they understood as childhood maltreatment-related and attachment-relevant. The model may inform education, supervision, and future patient-inclusive research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.