ArticleRadiation oncology journal2026
Feasibility of surface-guided radiotherapy for detecting patient instability during prostate radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMaintaining patient immobility during radiotherapy is essential for accurate dose delivery; however, patients may experience discomfort during treatment, leading to involuntary movement. Continuous imaging to detect intrafractional changes is not routinely feasible in conventional fractionation due to radiation exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of knee-based surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) as a real-time method for detecting subtle patient motion during prostate radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 125 patients undergoing prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (2,527 fractions) were monitored using an SGRT system with the knees as the region of interest. Mean and maximum displacement per fraction were analyzed. Clinical factors, including bladder volume, age, International Prostate Symptom Score, laxative use, and overactive bladder medication, were evaluated. A displacement threshold of ≥4 mm was defined as an operational level to identify notable motion events.
resultsDisplacement ≥4 mm was observed in 357 of 2,527 fractions (14.1%). Larger displacements were more frequent in the latter half of sessions and were often suggestive of urinary urgency. In a single case, motion improved following verbal instruction. Bladder volume was significantly associated with both mean displacement (p = 0.025) and the proportion of fractions with displacement ≥4 mm (p = 0.004), whereas other factors were not consistent predictors. Knee motion monitoring allowed real-time detection of patient movement requiring clinical attention.
conclusionKnee-based SGRT appears to be a feasible, non-invasive method for monitoring patient motion. While not a surrogate for prostate displacement, it may help identify patient instability and support timely clinical responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.