Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42392635›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Towards use of Patient-informed Relevant Outcomes (PRO) in trials of bloodstream infections: a mixed-methods study protocol (BALANCE+PRO).

Ranjani Somayaji, Victoria Haldane, Rob Fowler, Karla D Krewulak, Nadine Foster, Shelley Longmore, Sean W X Ong, Steven Tong, Benjamin A Rogers, Lisa Burry and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06537609 (BALANCE+), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06537609 narecruitingnot on this map

BALANCE+: A Platform Trial for Gram Negative Bloodstream Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2024 to 2028Enrolled2,500ConditionsGram-negative BacteremiaArmsDe-escalation VS No De-escalation, Oral beta-lactams VS non beta-lactams, Central vascular catheter retention VS Central vascular catheter replacement, Cephalosporin VS Carbapenem for low risk AmpC organisms, Routine follow-up blood culture VS No routine follow-up blood culture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ranjani SomayajiDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada rsomayaj@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3731-9675
Victoria HaldaneDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rob FowlerDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karla D KrewulakDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-4122
Nadine FosterDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shelley LongmoreDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sean W X OngDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-436X
Steven TongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-8356
Benjamin A RogersMelbourne Center for Clinical Trials, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-2118
Lisa BurryDepartments of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sinai Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine KisselDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David L PatersonADVANCE-ID Network, National University Singapore Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore.
Nick DanemanDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3764
Kirsten FiestDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-6594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although recent clinical trials have increasingly adopted patient-centred outcome measures, patient-informed selection of outcome measures remains limited in infectious disease research. Greater deliberate engagement and partnership with patients and families are required to ensure that outcomes reflect priorities that are meaningful to those with lived experience. Our study aims to incorporate patient-informed perspectives into outcome selection for BSI clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake an exploratory sequential mixed methods study nested with the currently running international BALANCE+ trial of Gram-negative BSI (NCT06537609). All study materials will be co-developed and piloted with patient partners. Phase I will consist of virtual focus groups with past patient and family member participants of the BALANCE+ trial from intensive care and ward settings (total of 24-40 participants), using purposive sampling to maximise variation across demographic characteristics. Data will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using dual independent coding and consensus methods. Phase II will encompass development and administration of a survey (total ~100 respondents) to rank and prioritise outcomes identified in phase I, with responses descriptively summarised and integrated with qualitative findings. In phase III, virtual meetings with relevant parties including patients/families and investigators/study team members in the infectious disease field will be held to generate consensus-based recommendations and inform implementations with BALANCE+ and future trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Calgary for all study activities and participating BALANCE+ sites to enable recruitment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, community engagement, conference presentations and integration into ongoing and future trials.

Indexed as

BacteremiaPatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSepsisClinical Trials as TopicFocus GroupsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignClinical TrialPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42392635
PMCPMC13331091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.