ArticleBMJ open2026
US professional medical societies' public statements regarding violence in Palestine and Israel from October to December 2023: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to analyse the quantity and content of publicly discoverable statements that US-based medical societies issued regarding the 2023 escalation of violence in Palestine and Israel.
designWe conducted a mixed-methods study using an explanatory sequential design.
methodsInclusion criteria were defined as US-based medical societies from the American Medical Association House of Delegates, Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS), or Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Council for Academic Specialty Societies, yielding 186 US-based professional medical societies. Descriptive statistics and oods ratios (ORs) were used to assess the association between society characteristics and odds of statement issuance. A qualitative inductive and deductive thematic approach was employed to identify themes from public statements made from 7 October 2023 to 7 December 2023.
results22 professional medical societies (N=22/186, 11.83%) issued 20 unique public statements regarding violence in Israel and Palestine. Exploratory OR analyses suggested associations between statement issuance and several society characteristics, though CIs were wide and thus underscored uncertainty regarding the magnitude of these associations. Exploratory OR analyses suggested that statement issuance was associated with possession of a lobbying arm (OR 26.83, 95% CI 3.53 to 204.25, p<0.01); a society diversity, equity, and inclusivity initiative (OR 6.57, 95% CI 1.48 to 29.04, p=0.01); a society global health or international initiative (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.23 to 7.86, p=0.02); a society land acknowledgment or indigenous health initiative (OR 8.47, 95% CI 1.60 to 44.99, p=0.01); and prior issuance of a statement about the Russo-Ukrainian War (OR 38.83, 95% CI 10.63 to 141.75, p<0.01). Of the 20 unique, publicly discoverable statements found, 25% (N=5/20) used verbiage indicating exclusive support for Israeli or Jewish civilians, while none expressed sole support for Palestinian civilians. Our qualitative analysis revealed three main thematic categories of statement content: (1) those expressing support for or condemnation of a specific group, (2) those providing historical context, and (3) those describing a society's approach to statement issuance.
conclusionMost professional medical societies did not make a public statement regarding violence in Palestine and Israel, and societies that previously engaged in political or international advocacy were more likely to issue a statement. Statements generally avoided any historical, contextual, or geopolitical framing and were more likely to reference Israeli victims than Palestinian victims of violence as well as violence by Hamas than Israeli state violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.