Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42392606›Full record

SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2026

Diagnostic accuracy of tachypnoea for predicting mortality and identifying sepsis in young infants aged 0-59 days: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Suci Ardini Widyaningsih, Sophie Driker, Alastair Fung, Naomi Schmeck, Sitarah Mathias, Megan Yu, Yasir Shafiq, Amber Hoey, Tessa Kehoe, Yumin Kim and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Suci Ardini WidyaningsihDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA suci.ardini.w@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8606-1116
Sophie DrikerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5391-2085
Alastair FungDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-4947
Naomi SchmeckDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9969-2620
Sitarah MathiasHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-5186
Megan YuDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-6879
Yasir ShafiqCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-724X
Amber HoeyBryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9677-9839
Tessa KehoeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2751-5266
Yumin KimBrown Global Alliance for Infant and Maternal Health Research, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8794-5552
Jana AdnanVayu Global Health Foundation, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0633-7456
Anum S HussainiDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-3718
Carrie G WadeCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5972-7242
Anne Cc LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-9862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTachypnoea is a danger sign for predicting mortality and identifying sepsis. We systematically reviewed evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of different tachypnoea thresholds for predicting mortality and sepsis in infants aged 0-59 days.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus and CENTRAL for studies reporting associations or diagnostic accuracy of tachypnoea (≥60, ≥70 or ≥80 breaths per minute (bpm)) for predicting mortality and culture-confirmed sepsis in infants aged 0-59 days. We followed Cochrane methods for study screening, data extraction and quality assessment. We pooled ORs using random-effects models and sensitivity/specificity using random-effects bivariate models. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence.

resultsOf 7641 studies identified, 18 were included (n=92 398). Tachypnoea≥60 bpm had a pooled OR of 3.14 (95% CI 1.30 to 7.56; 5 studies; n=10 407) for predicting mortality and a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI 19% to 45%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI 66% to 97%; 4 studies; n=7104). For culture-confirmed sepsis, tachypnoea≥60 bpm had an OR of 1.26 (95% CI 0.66 to 2.38; 4 studies; n=3996), and a sensitivity of 28% (95% CI 10% to 58%) and a specificity of 67% (95% CI 53% to 78%; 3 studies; n=693). The higher threshold of tachypnoea≥70 bpm was associated with a higher odds of mortality (OR 10.06 (95% CI 2.39 to 42.35); 2 studies; n=12 138) and resulted in higher specificity (99.4% (95% CI 99.1% to 99.6%)) but lower sensitivity (10.9% (95% CI 5.3% to 19.1%)) for mortality (1 study; n=5214). Data were insufficient to assess performance by age subgroup (0-6 vs 7-59 days). The certainty of evidence was very low.

conclusionsTachypnoea≥60 bpm is associated with a threefold increased odds of mortality in young infants, supporting its use as a danger sign. Given its relatively low sensitivity alone, tachypnoea should be interpreted alongside other clinical signs to optimise diagnostic accuracy. While higher thresholds (≥70 bpm) demonstrated stronger associations and increased specificity for predicting mortality, low sensitivity may limit clinical utility. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023431387.

Indexed as

SepsisTachypneaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityChild HealthInfantMortalityNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID42392606
PMCPMC13330899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.