ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
A Novel Sampling and Analytical Framework for Airborne Carbon Nanotubes.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Airborne carbon nanotubes (CNTs) present growing environmental and occupational health concerns. Like asbestos, CNT can deposit deep in the lungs and induce toxic effects, underscoring the need for accurate exposure metrics amid increasing global production. Current exposure assessment methods by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) rely on mass-based measurements and indirect transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which often underestimate exposure, particularly for nanoscale fibers. To overcome these limitations, the objectives of this study were to develop a CNT-specific sampling and analysis method to improve fiber detection and characterization and validate its performance by comparing the novel diffusion-based sampler, Tsai Diffusion Sampler (TDS), with conventional approaches. Samplers were operated side-by-side under controlled conditions to ensure comparability. Furthermore, polycarbonate (PC) and mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters were evaluated for all of the sampling configurations. CNTs collected onto filters and TEM grids were examined for their corresponding direct or indirect analysis. An automated image segmentation algorithm was applied to CNT images to ensure consistent fiber sizing and to support a count-based exposure metric. Results demonstrated that the TDS (which utilizes low flow rate) paired with PC filters most effectively captured individualized nanoscale fibers, enabling recovery of CNT structures of less than 100 nm that were underrepresented in compared methods. Aerosolized hydrophilic CNTs exhibited higher number concentrations than hydrophobic CNTs, while open-face samplers with MCE filters produced the highest mass concentrations. Importantly, these findings establish a reproducible, integrated sampling, and analytical framework that enhances CNT exposure assessment and supports refinement of occupational health guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.