ArticleClinical and experimental pediatrics2026
Efficacy and safety of home-based fiberoptic blanket versus hospital-based light-emitting diode phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: a retrospective cohort study from Thailand.
Article in Clinical and experimental pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Home phototherapy (HPT) is an alternative to inpatient phototherapy (IPT) for the treatment of neonatal jaundice; however, comparative data remain limited on the effectiveness of phototherapy (PT) devices across care settings. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of HPT using a fiberoptic light-emitting diode (LED) PT blanket with those of IPT using overhead LED PT in neonates with jaundice. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included neonates born at ≥35 weeks' gestation who were prescribed treatment for jaundice at a tertiary academic medical center in Thailand between August 1, 2023, and December 31, 2025. Infants who underwent either HPT or IPT were included. The bilirubin reduction, treatment success, and adverse event rates were compared between groups. Results: A total of 100 PT sessions (89 neonates) were analyzed, including 55 HPT sessions (50 infants) and 45 IPT sessions (43 infants). Some infants received both treatment modalities during separate sessions, and each session was analyzed according to the administered PT modality. The mean bilirubin reduction rate was significantly lower in the HPT versus IPT group (0.18±0.10 mg/dL/hr vs. 0.29±0.08 mg/dL/hr, P<0.001). This finding remained consistent in uni- and multivariate multilevel mixed-effects linear regression analyses, accounting for repeated PT sessions, intergroup crossover, and potential confounders (coefficient, -0.116; 95% confidence interval, -0.146 to -0.086; P<0.001). Treatment success was achieved in all infants except for one in the HPT group who experienced an increase in total serum bilirubin following treatment that subsequently resolved after conversion to IPT. No serious PT-related complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, fiberoptic home PT was safe but less effective than hospital-based LED PT at reducing bilirubin levels, supporting its use in carefully selected neonates with appropriate monitoring and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.