Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42392339›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2026

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

Yasmine Salman, Amanda E Denning, Jolien M Schaeverbeke, Sandra O Tomé, Nicolas Joudiou, Pulkit Khandelwal, Paul A Yushkevich, Rik Vandenberghe, Bernard Gallez, Laura Em Wisse and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yasmine SalmanInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 52, Brussels, 1200, Belgium. Electronic address: yasmine.salman@uclouvain.be.
Amanda E DenningDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, 415 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104.
Jolien M SchaeverbekeLaboratory of Neuropathology - Department of Imaging and Pathology and Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N IV, Herestraat 49, box 1032, Leuven, 3000, Belgium; Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra O ToméLaboratory of Neuropathology - Department of Imaging and Pathology and Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N IV, Herestraat 49, box 1032, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Nicolas JoudiouNuclear and Electron Spin Technologies (NEST) Platform, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Avenue E. Mounier 73, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
Pulkit KhandelwalDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, B 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02155, USA.
Paul A YushkevichDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rik VandenbergheLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Bernard GallezBiomedical Magnetic Resonance Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 73, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
Laura Em WisseDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Klinikgatan 13B, Lund, 22185, Sweden.
Bernard J HanseeuwInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 52, Brussels, 1200, Belgium; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, B 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02155, USA; Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG072979 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID A WOLK · 2021 to 2026
$24.8M
Ex Vivo Imaging of the Aging Brain to Discover Morphology/Pathology AssociationsR01AG056014 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A. Yushkevich · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Ex Vivo Imaging of the Aging Brain to Discover Morphology/Pathology AssociationsRF1AG056014 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2023 to 2023
$2.1M
Improving the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG069474 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOLK, DAVID A, YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2024 to 2025
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056014NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069474NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG056014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is central to the study and diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Yet, no MRI biomarker is currently specific to a given neurodegenerative disease. This may result from the limited resolution of conventional MRI, which restricts detailed investigation of medial temporal lobe (MTL) subregions, a crucial hub for many neuropathologies. Moreover, in vivo MRI cannot be directly compared with neuropathological data, the gold standard for disease definition. Even when antemortem MRI and postmortem analyses are combined, the time gap between imaging and neuropathological examination allows pathogenic processes to progress, reducing the accuracy of these correlations. Over the past two decades, postmortem MRI has gained increasing interest because it enables long, motion-free acquisitions and the use of specialized coils and preclinical scanners, providing ultra-high spatial resolution. Additionally, it allows direct correspondence between imaging and neuropathological measures. Consequently, volumetric postmortem MRI, particularly investigations of the MTL, has become an increasingly common approach in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD). This narrative review specifically focuses on volumetric postmortem MRI of the MTL and summarizes the main methodologies for anatomical postmortem MTL imaging in ADRD and recent advances in the characterization of neurodegenerative changes, from brain preparation to MRI acquisition. It also highlights the translational potential of volumetric postmortem MRI for developing in vivo biomarkers, optimizing imaging protocols and segmentation methods, and assessing the impact of proteinopathies. Finally, it outlines current limitations, technical challenges, and perspectives for future research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTemporal LobeAnimalsBiomarkersHumansPostmortem ImagingBiomarkersMedial temporal lobeNeurodegenerative diseasesPostmortem MRI

Identifiers

PMID42392339
PMCPMC13480300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.