Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42392195›Full record

ArticleJournal of texture studies2026

Food Classification for Swallowing Disorders Perception by Senior Population.

Kovan Ismael-Mohammed, Laura Laguna, Mireia Bolívar-Prados, Pere Clavé, Amparo Tarrega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of texture studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kovan Ismael-MohammedInstitute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA, CSIC), Paterna, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-0237
Laura LagunaInstitute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA, CSIC), Paterna, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-1886
Mireia Bolívar-PradosGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-1150
Pere ClavéGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.
Amparo TarregaInstitute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA, CSIC), Paterna, Spain.

Funding

202270I121-PIE INCORPORACIÓN CIENTÍFICOS TITULARESCEX2021-001189-S/MCIU/MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-117016 RB-100MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PRE2021-09699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Texture-modified diets (TMDs) contain safe foods for individuals with dysphagia, such as soft solids or thick liquids. Considering the large population affected by dysphagia, especially older adults, it is essential to accurately measure the physical properties of these foods. The rheological and textural characteristics defined in major dysphagia guidelines-IDDSI, BDA, and the Smile Care System-are based on the experience and perception of health experts, but it is mostly unknown to which physical parameter corresponds to the classification. It is also uncertain whether older adults with dysphagia, who are the primary users of these guidelines, fully understand the classification levels and safety recommendations. This study aimed to (i) identify discrepancies between instrumental measurements and human-based classification systems, and (ii) understand the difficulties encountered when the elderly population attempts to follow this dietary guideline. To investigate this, classical tests (Texture Profile Analysis and viscosity at 50s

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersFoodAgedAged, 80 and overDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRheologyViscositydysphagia assessmentfood classification systemsIDDSI probesthickened liquids

Identifiers

PMID42392195
PMCPMC13327767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.