Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42392192›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Structural Equation Modeling Reveals How Allometry Shapes Integration in Avian Cranial Evolution.

J W Oyston, J T Thorson, A Knapp, R D Marek, R N Felice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J W OystonDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-7271
J T ThorsonResource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., WA 98115, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-1010
A KnappDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
R D MarekDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
R N FeliceDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-9213

Funding

UK Research and Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing hypotheses of phenotypic modularity involves assessing whether groups of traits covary more strongly with each other than with parts outside the group. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a flexible statistical framework for interrogating complex relationships between sets of variables, making it ideally suited to studies of hierarchical modularity and integration. However, quantifying the modular organization of high-dimensional traits using SEM in a phylogenic context has only recently become possible through new methodological advances. Here, we applied SEM to investigate patterns and correlates of phenotypic modularity in the skull and brain of birds. Birds independently evolved relatively large brains multiple times, as well as a wide range of different skull and brain morphologies. While some have proposed the bird skull is composed of several functional or developmental modules, others have suggested the skull is highly integrated, with allometric scaling structuring trait correlations. The data best supported a model in which brain shape is influenced by a hard tissue module consisting of neurocranium and rostrum (RS) shape, as well as the jaw musculature. RS itself does not strongly covary with other aspects of the skull and brain however, suggesting decoupling of beak morphology from the rest of the avian cranium. All variables, with the exception of RS, are strongly influenced by size, supporting the idea that allometry is a major influence on craniofacial integration in birds. These results provide new insights into likely drivers shaping the evolution of the skull in birds and highlight the usefulness of phyloSEM testing hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and integration.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBirdsBrainSkullAnimalsModels, BiologicalPhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID42392192
PMCPMC13393896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.