ArticleBlood advances2026
Real-world outcomes with BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies in plasma cell leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPatients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) are generally excluded from pivotal T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) trials. We evaluated real-world outcomes in a multicenter retrospective study of 122 patients with primary or secondary PCL across 15 academic centers, categorized as active (≥5% circulating plasma cells within 30 days before BsAb initiation) or historical. Patients received teclistamab (37%), elranatamab (11%), talquetamab as a line of therapy (Tal LOT, 42%), or talquetamab as bridging to CAR T-cell therapy (Tal Bridge, 11%). Cytokine release syndrome was grade 1 to 2 in 56% and grade 3 to 4 in 4% of patients, whereas neurotoxicity was grade 1 to 2 in 16% and grade 3 to 4 in 5% of patients. The overall response rate was 55%, including 61% with Tal LOT, 58% with Tal Bridge, 46% with elranatamab, and 33% with teclistamab. With a median follow-up of 8.3 months, talquetamab demonstrated superior survival. Tal LOT showed a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.5 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 11.5 months, and both were unreached in the Tal Bridge cohort. In contrast, teclistamab and elranatamab showed a mPFS values of 1.2 and 1.6 months and mOS values of 8.1 and 3.6 months, respectively (P = .007, P = .023). In active PCL, Tal LOT achieved mPFS/mOS of 6.9/12.2 months vs 0.7/1.4 months with teclistamab and 1.0/3.1 months with elranatamab, respectively (P< .001, P = .002). Multivariable analysis associated active PCL with worse survival and Tal LOT with improved outcomes. BsAbs were well tolerated in PCL, with talquetamab showing superior outcomes compared with B-cell maturation antigen-directed BsAbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.