Observational studyNursing outlook
Nurse staffing disparities in nursing homes: Effects of community distress level and COVID-19.
Observational study in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExamining nursing home staffing trends throughout COVID-19 provides critical insights for developing equitable workforce policies and resource allocation strategies. PURPOSE: To examine differences in nurse staffing levels across community distress levels, focusing on the temporal trends from 2019 to 2023.
methodsThis longitudinal observational study used random intercept mixed-effects models to analyze retrospectively collected data from 15,042 certified nursing homes. Data were merged from 2019 to 2023 Nursing Home Compare, 2019 to 2021 LTCFocus, and the 2016 to 2018 Distressed Community Index (DCI). Outcomes were case-mix adjusted hours per resident day (HPRD) for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and certified nursing assistants (CNAs). Predictors included DCI quintile and calendar quarter interactions, adjusting for bed count, ownership, chain affiliation, dementia unit status, payer mix, and five-star rating.
resultsRN HPRD were lower in nursing homes in more distressed communities, with the fifth and first quintile HPRD gap widening during the pandemic (2020 Q2 = -0.187 [-0.220, -0.155]; 2020 Q3 = -0.201 [-0.234, -0.169]; 2020 Q4 = -0.211 [-0.244, -0.179]). LPN HPRD were highest in the most distressed communities, with the fifth and first quintile gap narrowing post-pandemic (2021 Q4 = 0.050 [0.022, 0.077]; 2022 Q4 = 0.036 [0.009, 0.063]; 2023 Q4 = 0.027 [0.000, 0.054]). CNA HPRD were lowest in the most distressed communities and varied inconsistently across communities, with post-pandemic levels falling below pre-pandemic baselines. DISCUSSION: The pandemic widened RN staffing gaps in distressed nursing homes, forcing LPN substitution, while CNA staffing fell below pre-pandemic levels. Addressing these compounding shortages requires targeted financial incentives and equitable, data-driven staffing policies.
conclusionDistinct staffing patterns across DCI quintiles call for systematic investigation into appropriate staffing levels and targeted policies to ensure quality care in under-resourced nursing homes and inform public health emergency preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.