Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391626›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2026

From Alliance to Nexus: Rethinking Digital Therapeutic Relationships.

Daniela B Cadena, Juliane U Walther, Christian A Brünahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniela B CadenaPsychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Department of Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg - University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Schwerin, Mecklenburg Vorpommern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1042-1610
Juliane U WaltherPsychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Department of Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg - University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Schwerin, Mecklenburg Vorpommern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5963-3296
Christian A BrünahlPsychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Department of Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg - University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Schwerin, Mecklenburg Vorpommern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1578-4421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In traditional human psychotherapy, the therapeutic alliance (TA) is regarded as a fundamental factor that describes the client-therapist relationship, mainly due to strong evidence demonstrating its impact on treatment outcomes regardless of theoretical orientation. More recently, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and other technologies have led to the emergence of the concept of digital TA, used to characterize the relationship between clients and AI-based therapeutic systems. This approach replicates human dynamics but overlooks key differences between human therapists and digital agents. Prematurely translating the concept of TA into the digital context fails to address issues such as the sycophantic tendencies of current systems and the inherent limitations of algorithmic interaction. We propose the digital therapeutic nexus, a framework that recognizes these differences and provides a set of structured criteria for categorizing digital interactions into 3 progressive levels. This Viewpoint argues that only at the highest level can parallels be drawn to the human TA and stratifies the main risks associated with each nexus level. Transitioning from the concept of alliance to that of a nexus offers a more precise conceptual basis for describing and evaluating digital therapeutic relationships, with implications for research, design, and the ethical development of AI-based mental health interventions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePsychotherapyTherapeutic AllianceDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansAIartificial intelligencechatbotdigital therapeutic alliancedigital therapeutic nexushuman-computer interactionlarge language modelsmental healthsycophancytherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID42391626
PMCPMC13376847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.