Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391575›Full record

ReviewPlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026

Anthocyanins and betalains in evolution: Why mutual exclusion remains the best-supported model.

B Pucker, M I Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B PuckerPlant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, IZMB, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7471
M I KhanBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-926X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthocyanins and betalains are hydrophilic plant pigments with numerous physiological and ecological functions. The biosynthesis routes of anthocyanins and betalains differ, with anthocyanins being synthesized from phenylalanine via the general phenylpropanoid pathway, whereas betalains are derived from tyrosine. Although the precursors phenylalanine and tyrosine are present in all plants, there is no known plant in which both these pigments are co-accumulated. Most plants synthesize anthocyanins, while certain families in the order Caryophyllales produce betalains. There is an apparent mutual exclusion of these two plant pigments. Over the past five decades, evidence has accumulated supporting this theory of mutual exclusion of the two pigments. However, recently published reports claim the presence of anthocyanins in well-known betalain-pigmented plants without providing the necessary evidence. Here, we critically evaluate the origins of such claims, show how methodological limitations and analytical misinterpretations have led to unsupported reports of anthocyanin-betalain co-occurrence, and provide recommendations to ensure robust evidence standards in future studies of plant pigment biosynthesis.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsBetalainsBiological EvolutionPlantsCaryophyllalesPhenylalanineTyrosineAnthocyaninsBetalainsPhenylalanineTyrosineANSarGSTDFRDODevolutionphenylalaninetyrosine

Identifiers

PMID42391575
PMCPMC13586639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.