Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391554›Full record

Trial reportJMIR medical education2026

Digital Simulation-Based Ultrasound Training for Physiotherapy Students: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Belen Diaz-Pulido, Jorge Méndez-Rodriguez, Daniel Pecos-Martin, Santiago Garcia-Miguel, Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa, Nicolas Cuenca-Zaldívar, Fermín Naranjo-Cinto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel Fernández-CarneroUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud,, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-1627
Belen Diaz-PulidoUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud,, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-4045
Jorge Méndez-RodriguezDevelopment and Programming Department, Amazonic Global, s.l, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-4522-1787
Daniel Pecos-MartinUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud,, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-0998
Santiago Garcia-MiguelUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud,, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-9518-5345
Alexander Achalandabaso-OchoaDepartment of Health Sciences, Unversidad de Jaen, Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1989-2988
Nicolas Cuenca-ZaldívarResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Puerta de Hierro Health Research Institute-Segovia de Arana (IDIPHISA), C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain, 34 639962935.ORCID 0000-0002-6787-3944
Fermín Naranjo-CintoFacultad de Medicina, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-3120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound education has traditionally relied on on-site training, but scalable digital solutions are increasingly needed. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation-based online ultrasound platform compared with traditional on-site training. Methods: A prospective randomized blinded study was conducted with 68 physiotherapy students (n=34 per group). Participants were assigned to a simulation-based online training platform (WAZO) or traditional on-site instruction. Both groups completed identical theoretical and practical assessments. Item response theory using a Rasch model was applied to evaluate item difficulty and student ability. Results: No significant differences were found between the online and on-site groups in theoretical scores (mean 4.94, SD 1.47 vs mean 5.08, SD 1.14; P=.65) or practical performance variables, including probe handling (26/34, 76.5% vs 28/34, 82.4%; P=.37) and structure identification (24/34, 70.6% vs 22/34, 64.7%; P=.19). Measurement outcomes also showed no significant differences, including structure diameter (mean 3.78, SD 0.79 mm vs mean 3.98, SD 1.27 mm; P=.46) and structure surface distance (mean 3.94, SD 1.97 mm vs mean 3.24, SD 0.64 mm; P=.06). Item response theory analysis identified image optimization, structure diameter, and structure surface distance as the most difficult items, while probe handling and structure identification were the most informative. The model demonstrated high discriminative performance (area under the curve=0.93), with sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%. Conclusions: Simulation-based online ultrasound training provides comparable theoretical and practical outcomes to traditional on-site instruction, supporting its use as a scalable and accessible educational alternative.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesUltrasonographydigital health educationitem response theoryphysiotherapy educationrandomized controlled trialsimulation-based trainingultrasound education

Identifiers

PMID42391554
PMCPMC13327370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.