ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Malleable Penile Prosthesis Fractures: Lessons Learned from 17 Years of Experience at a Tertiary Center in Brazil.
Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo critically evaluate the clinical presentation, imaging performance and surgical findings of malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) fractures in a high-volume tertiary center. MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical reports of men who underwent revision surgery with intraoperative confirmation of MPP fracture between January 2008 and January 2025 were reviewed. MPP from a single manufacturer (Promedon®, Cordoba, Argentina) were inserted, and no comparisons were possible. Demographic data, presenting symptoms, imaging findings, and fracture location were analyzed. Diagnostic performance of physical examination and imaging modalities was descriptively compared.
resultsAmong 741 penile prosthetic procedures, 98 were revisions and 52 (53.1%) were due to MPP fracture. Median time from implantation to fracture was 59 months (IQR 24.8-84.0). Penile instability was the most common symptom (96.1%), while pain was reported in 21.1%. Physical examination correctly identified fractures in 88.5% of cases, outperforming radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Bilateral fractures occurred in 51.9% of revisions, most commonly in the proximal segment. Recurrent fractures occurred in 28.2% of patients.
conclusionsMPP fractures are more prevalent than expected and a clinically relevant complication in high-volume centers. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical assessment, with physical examination outperforming imaging modalities. Increased awareness of typical presentation patterns may support earlier recognition and more efficient management. Prospective studies are needed to identify modifiable risk factors, improve device design and quality, and advise patients on use to potentially improve prosthesis lifetime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.