ArticleThe Permanente journal2026
Colorectal Cancer Screening Materials for Tribal Communities in the Great Plains and Washington State: Application of Boot Camp Translation.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects American Indian and Alaska Native communities. One approach to increasing CRC screening is to develop tailored messages and materials. In collaboration with the Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health Board (GPTLHB) and the South Puget Intertribal Planning Agency (SPIPA), the authors employed an adapted approach of boot camp translation (BCT), a validated community-based participatory method, to co-create tailored CRC materials.
methodsTo enhance cultural relevance, the authors reframed the BCT process and renamed the sessions as "listening sessions." Listening sessions were conducted with GPTLHB in Rapid City, South Dakota, and with SPIPA in Shelton, Washington. Each included a 1-day in-person meeting and 2 virtual conferences. The objectives were to co-create materials and messages that motivate members to complete CRC screening and identify preferred communication channels for CRC-related information within the tribal community.
resultsThe authors met with 53 tribal members across organizations. Both GPTLHB and SPIPA sessions emphasized the need for a multigenerational approach and culturally and locally relevant imagery, language, and traditions. GPTLHB members wished to include Lakota words, simple illustrations for colon health education, and recognition of traditional healing practices. SPIPA members underscored the importance of water as a symbol of healing and local intertribal milestones, such as the canoe journey. Preferred dissemination channels included physical fact sheets, posters, visual stories, animated videos, and live-action videos.
conclusionUsing modified BCT, the authors partnered with American Indian and Alaska Native communities to co-create screening messages for CRC and identified favored dissemination networks tailored to each community's context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.